Share
News

Dems Want Law Limiting SCOTUS to 18 Year Terms After RBG's 27 Years

Share

House Democrats are set to introduce legislation that would eliminate the lifetime appointments of US Supreme Court justices, replacing the lifetime appointment with a single 18-year term.

US Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA), the author of the legislation, along with Reps. Joe Kennedy III (D-MA), and Don Beyer (D-VA), plan to introduce the “Supreme Court Term Limits and Regular Appointments Act” on September 29th, 2020.

“It would save the country a lot of agony and help lower the temperature over fights for the court that go to the fault lines of cultural issues and is one of the primary things tearing at our social fabric,” Khanna said.

The proposed legislation would restrict every president to two Supreme Court appointments per four-year term. Those appointed under the new scheme would become “senior” upon “retirement” from the high court and rotate down to lower courts.

Aside from the Executive Branch appointment and the Legislative Branch “advice and consent” role, the Judicial Branch is a co-equal branch of government.

Trending:
'Bite Your Tongue!': Elizabeth Warren Lashes Out At CBS Panel When They Bring Up Biden's Abysmal Approval Ratings

The lifetime appointment of US Supreme Court Justices, meant to establish independence from the political trappings of the Executive and Legislative Branches, is codified in the US Constitution though not through any direct language. Article III, Section 1, of the US Constitution states:

“…The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.”

Regarding the independence of the Supreme Court, Northeastern University law professor Michael Meltsner, who specializes in the Supreme Court, made it clear that lifetime appointments to the Supreme Court are necessary to “insulate justices from partisan politics.”

“That was put into the Constitution to preserve the total independence of the judiciary. Once a justice is confirmed and takes a seat on the court, they’re not beholden to anybody,” Meltsner said. “This makes Supreme Court justices free to issue rulings based on the law, rather than political favor.”

Khanna’s move to establish limits on the tenures of US Supreme Court Justices comes at a moment of political tension. President Donald Trump will announce his nomination to fill the seat left vacant by Justice Ginsburg’s death on Saturday and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), has stated he will fast track the process of confirmation.

Ginsburg served for 27 years before her death last week.

Submit a Correction →



Tags:
, , , ,
Share
About the Author:
Frank Salvato is the co-host of the Underground USA podcast and host of the National File podcast RightMinded. His writing has been recognized by the US House International Relations Committee and the Japan Center for Conflict Prevention, and has been published by The American Enterprise Institute, The Washington Times, Accuracy in Media, and Breitbart. Mr. Salvato appeared on The O'Reilly Factor on FOX News Channel and is the author of six books examining internal and external threats facing our country. He can be heard twice weekly on “The Captain’s America: Third Watch” radio program syndicated nationally on the Salem Broadcasting Network and Genesis Communications affiliate stations.




National File is committed to ensuring your voice can and will be heard. To keep your speech free, we are switching our commenting platform to Insticator. Don’t worry! All you have to do is create a commenting account with Insticator. We will be transferring previous comments to our new site, and then you will be able to link your past comments to your new Insticator account. If you have any feedback or questions about your Insticator commenting account, please email them at: [email protected]

Conversation