Last Updated on June 9, 2025
In May of 2025, reports emerged that Palantir, co-founded by Peter Thiel, is building a master list of personal information on Americans, potentially granting President Donald Trump immense surveillance power.
This breaking news, detailed by Raw Story and The Economic Times, reveals Palantir’s role in a Trump administration initiative to merge data across federal agencies.
Consequently, the Palantir surveillance Americans effort raises significant privacy concerns. The company, paid at least $113 million since Trump took office, is deploying its Gotham and Foundry platforms. Now, the implications of this surveillance infrastructure demand scrutiny. Watch Ian Carroll’s analysis here:
In March, President Trump signed an executive order calling for the federal government to share data across various agencies, a move that has not been publicly discussed since but is being implemented with Palantir’s assistance.
This executive order lays the groundwork for Palantir’s involvement, as reported by Raw Story. Palantir’s Gotham software, already used by defense and intelligence agencies, will now profile domestic behavior, detect fraud, and identify risky individuals or patterns.
The Economic Times reported that Palantir is building “the most expansive civilian surveillance infrastructure in U.S. history,” integrating real-time data and AI. As stated in the article:
“Palantir isn’t just improving old databases—it’s building what some experts are calling the most expansive civilian surveillance infrastructure in U.S. history. Instead of scattered files and spreadsheets, the platform will use real-time data integration and artificial intelligence to profile behavior, detect fraud, and identify individuals or patterns deemed risky by the system.” – The Economic Times
This development underscores the scale and potential impact of Palantir’s involvement in domestic surveillance. Raw Story further highlighted the deployment of Palantir’s Foundry platform, noting:
“The push has put a key Palantir product called Foundry into at least four federal agencies, including [the Department of Homeland Security] and the Health and Human Services Department. Widely adopting Foundry, which organizes and analyzes data, paves the way for Mr. Trump to easily merge information from different agencies, the government officials said. Creating detailed portraits of Americans based on government data is not just a pipe dream.” – Raw Story
This expansion into multiple agencies amplifies concerns about privacy and data security. Additionally, the Trump administration seeks access to hundreds of data points, including bank accounts, student debt, medical claims, and disability status.
Meanwhile, Palantir’s stock surged 5.38% after the announcement, trading over 150% higher than post-election 2024 levels.
Therefore, it fuels debates over privacy, AI surveillance, and government overreach. In turn, this controversy challenges the balance between security and civil liberties.
Privacy advocates and former Palantir employees express alarm. Civil liberties groups warn of a “digital dragnet” with no public oversight, potentially used for political purposes or immigration crackdowns.
Thirteen former employees signed a letter urging Palantir to end its Trump work, citing misuse risks. Current employees worry about security breaches and the company’s association with Trump’s agenda.
Ian Carroll, on the Candace Owens Show, stated, “Palantir announces a new mega program with the Trump government… a digital mass surveillance system to target you and your family and all the rest of us.” He added, “This is not a partisan issue. In fact, this is a deeply anti-American issue.”
Democratic lawmakers caution that Trump could target immigrants and critics, but Carroll argues the surveillance will affect everyone, as governments rarely relinquish such power.
The implications are profound. For instance, Palantir’s role in this federal data effort could define U.S. digital infrastructure.
Meanwhile, the lack of legal guardrails raises fears of misuse. Therefore, it underscores the need for accountability.
In turn, this controversy highlights the tension between technological advancement and privacy rights. Palantir’s expansion into both public and private sectors, like AI-driven mortgage fraud detection with Fannie Mae, shows its growing influence.
However, the lack of concern from Republicans and conservatives is striking, reminiscent of their support for the Patriot Act.
Historically, Republicans backed the Patriot Act despite its long-term consequences for civil liberties, a pattern that seems to repeat with Palantir’s surveillance initiatives.
This indifference to future repercussions mirrors past decisions, raising questions about the prioritization of security over individual rights.
However, concerns about political risk persist. The real story, as Carroll notes, is still unfolding, with long-term implications for America’s digital future.
