Last Updated on May 31, 2021
Dr. Scott Jensen, who is running for Governor of Minnesota in 2022 as a Republican, is teaming up with doctors nationwide to try to get rid of the approval for the Coronavirus vaccine for America’s children as people worldwide report health problems and deaths after taking the vaccine. Apparently, some leftists don’t want Jensen to fight for children as millions of little schoolkids face vaccination in America. The group America’s Frontline Doctors and some parents are suing Joe Biden’s Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary in U.S. District Court to get a temporary restraining order on vaccines for kids, and now Scott Jensen is one of the plaintiffs in the case. (READ THE LAWSUIT HERE).
Scott Jensen, an ex-state senator, called out the CDC for potentially inflating Coronavirus death counts even before I confirmed that the CDC did this when I published research showing that the CDC inflated ‘Rona death counts by at least 1600 percent during the 2020 election (READ THAT RESEARCH HERE). For his bravery, Jensen became the subject of a vindictive investigation waged by the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice. But Scott Jensen is not backing down. “Kids matter. Unnecessary and unknown risks to their future health is reason enough to pause this frenzied vaccine rollout plan for children not yet through puberty,” stated Dr. Jensen.
AMERICA’S FRONTLINE DOCTORS, JENSEN, AND PARENTS STATE IN THEIR LAWSUIT AGAINST BIDEN’S HHS SECRETARY: “Plaintiffs bring before the Court today a request for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), and the relevant subagencies and personnel including but not limited to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institutes of Health (NIH), the DHHS Secretary, the DHHS Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, and the DHHS Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, seeking temporary injunctive relief against any existing or further authorization for use in children under the age of 16 , of any of the COVID-19 “vaccines”1 that have been approved under the Emergency Use Authorization (“EUA”) provided in 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3. In this Motion, Plaintiffs ask only that the status quo be maintained – that the EUAs not permit the use of COVID-19 vaccines in children under the age of 16, Case 2:21-cv-00702-CLM Document 1 Filed 05/19/21 Page 4 of 80 and that no further expansion of the EUAs to children under the age of 16 be granted prior to the resolution of these issues at trial. Such relief would protect the lives and safety of millions of children in the American public for whom serious illness and mortality from COVID-19 represent a zero percent (0%) risk statistically, but who face substantial risks from these experimental injections. Plaintiffs not only face the imminent threat of irreparable injury of various types absent a TRO, but they also represent a diverse cross-section of the American public. They are doctors and other medical professionals. They are parents and children. They are coaches and mentors. They are healthy, and they suffer from underlying conditions. They are from various states. They are from various walks of life. They are individuals and organizations. They are experts and they are lay people vaccinated in the past. . Most or all have been fully And they all have one thing in common. Absent the requested relief, each of their lives stands to be inexorably and irreparably altered forever…”
