An independent forensic audit of the Dominion Voting System machines and software in the troubled Michigan county of Antrim revealed that the very design of the system was crafted to influence elections and facilitate vote fraud.
A preliminary report by the Allied Security Operations Group concluded, “Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.”
Allied Security Operations Group was co-founded by Russell Ramsland Jr., a former Reagan administration official with Ivy league pedigrees from Harvard and Duke Universities. Ramsland worked for NASA and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
“The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors,” Ramsland’s team wrote in their preliminary conclusion after examining the machines in Antrim County.
“The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified,” the report continues.
These exact Dominion Voting Systems machines and software configurations are the focus of the Arizona State Senate’s subpoenas to Maricopa County ordering a full forensic audit of their Dominion Voting machines.
“We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results,” Russell Ramsland Jr., co-founder of Allied #Security Operations Group, said in a report. https://t.co/0qXmg5QYk5
— NTD News (@news_ntd) December 17, 2020
Ramsland’s team examined and performed “forensic duplication” on the Antrim County’s election management server. Forensic duplication is the copying of the contents of a storage device, completely and without alteration, for the purpose of evidence gathering.
The examination revealed that the tabulation log for the forensic examination tallied 15,676 individual events, of which approximately 68 percent were recorded errors.
“These errors resulted in overall tabulation errors or ballots being sent to adjudication,” the report read. “This high error rates proves the Dominion Voting System is flawed and does not meet state or federal election laws.”
“A staggering number of votes required adjudication. This was a 2020 issue not seen in previous election cycles still stored on the server,” the report revealed. “This is caused by intentional errors in the system. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, or audit trail. Our examination of the server logs indicates that this high error rate was incongruent with patterns from previous years. The statement attributing these issues to human error is not consistent with the forensic evaluation, which points more correctly to systemic machine and/or software errors. The systemic errors are intentionally designed to create errors in order to push a high volume of ballots to bulk adjudication.”
Predictably, the mainstream media and their lacky factcheckers immediately started to undermine the report and the credibility of Ramsland and is team. To that end, Gary Miliefsky, a founding member of the Department of Homeland Security and publisher of Cyber Defense Magazine, admonished their partisan attacks.
Miliefsky stated that Ramsland and his team “have the cybersecurity and forensic capabilities and expertise that cannot be dismissed.”
“In fact,” he said, “looking at their team, their patents, their experience, we now have a credible analysis that as I predicted, the Algorithms being used in the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed to create systematic fraud and influence election results and, in this case, not in the favor of President Trump.”